|
||
AIC HEALTH & SAFETY GUIDES
From Cradle to Grave:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Regulations and Their Acronyms
|
|
|
|
Again, some states have additional requirements for CESQGs, and a thorough check of state requirements is in order. For example, some states require CESQGs to follow some of the small quantity generators (SQG) requirements such as obtaining an EPA identification number, or compliance with specific with storage standards. Please note that these regulations change regularly and it is best that those responsible for the hazardous waste at each workplace check with each states environmental regulatory agency for an update on the regulations that cover CESQGs. The following summarizes some of these more stringent requirements.
CESQG Generator Size Categories: As noted previously, federal regulations characterize hazardous waste generators of less than 100 kilograms per month as conditionally exempt. Most states use the same exclusion level; however, the District of Columbia, Kansas, Rhode Island and Maine have adopted lower exclusion levels. These state rules have important implications for waste generators. For example, Kansas has established an exclusion level of 25 kg/mo. Thus a generator is considered a CESQG only if it generates less than this amount. Rhode Island and Maine fully regulate all hazardous waste generators and do not provide any conditional exemption. Thus, generators of less than 100 kg/mo must meet state requirements that equal federal requirements for LQGs.
State Hazardous Waste Identification Number: Unlike the federal government, at least eight states require all generators to obtain a state hazardous waste identification number. They are California, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Michegan, Minnesota, Rhode Island, and West Virginia. In addition, other states, such as Texas have special rules for industrial CESQGs. To further complicate matters, sometimes a state requires the generator to use a licenced transporter, and the transporter in turn requires a waste manifest and waste identification number.
State Storage Time Limits and On-site Waste Accumulation Limits: The storage time limit is the maximum amount of time a generator can hold hazardous waste on-site without a storage permit. Federal regulations allow CESQGs to store waste on-site indefinitely, provided that the maximum amount stored does not exceed 1,000 kg at any given time. Once the 1,000 kg limit is exceeded, all waste accumulated is subject to federal requirements for SQGs, which include a maximum storage time limit of 180 days, a maximum on-site accumulation limit of 6,000 kg, and other storage requirements.
Some states have adopted a limited storage time and/or a lower maximum storage limit. For example, five states (California, District of Columbia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Rhode Island) restrict storage time for all CESQGs. California, Louisiana, and Mississippi, each require a maximum storage period of 365 days. Rhode Island restricts the storage period for all generators to a maximum of 90 days (the LQG restriction).
State Licenses Required for Hauling Wastes and Generator Self-Transport Limits: At least eleven states (Arkansas, District of Columbia, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin) require all generators of less than 100 kg/mo to use a licensed commercial hazardous waste hauler or to obtain a license if they self- transport the waste. In addition, Michigan and New Jersey require CESQGs to use a licensed hauler or obtain a license only for the transport or self-transport of liquid industrial waste and waste oil, respectively. In Massachusetts, CESQGs who wish to self-transport their waste need only to register with the State. Also, in 1993, twelve states (California, Colorado, Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, South Carolina, and Washington) had limits on the amount of waste that CESQGs may self-transport. Self-transport limits ranged from 23 kg in California to 999 kg in Colorado.
State CESQG Manifest Requirements: Under federal regulations, CESQGs are exempt from using a manifest. But, at least ten states (California, Delaware, Louisiana, Idaho, Maine, Minnesota, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island) require all generators of less than 100 kg/mo to use a manifest. Michigan requires a manifest only for liquid industrial waste.
States mandating CESQG Waste Management in a Permitted Subtitle C Treatment, Storage, Disposal Facility (TSDF) only: Federal regulations allow CESQGs to manage their hazardous waste in one of three general types of waste management facilities [(1) Subtitle C TSDFs; (2) municipal or industrial solid waste facilities; or (3) a recycler]. At least seventeen states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, West Virginia, and Wisconsin) require these generators to manage their hazardous waste in a permitted Subtitle C TSDF, thus prohibiting disposal in a municipal or industrial waste landfill or other municipal, industrial facility. Also, at least six states ( Georgia, Michigan, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota and Tennessee) require CESQGs to manage specifically liquid industrial and ignitable wastes in a permitted Subtitle C TSDF.
State CESQG Reporting Requirements: Federal regulations do not require CESQGs to submit annual or biannual reports. However, at least six states (Arizona, California, Louisiana, Minnesota, Rhode Island, and Washington) have reporting requirements for all generators of less than 100 kg/mo. California and Rhode Island require CESQGs to report every two years. Arkansas, Arizona, Louisiana, Minnesota, and Washington have annual reporting requirements. Texas requires that CESQGs report monthly, but only submit a copy of the manifest if the waste is sent out of state. In addition, there may be other requirements. For example, Nebraska requires that CESQGs who self transport their waste receive DOT training.
Since state requirements are at least as stringent as federal ones, it is incumbent upon the generator to properly check with their state for details needed in proper waste management. (See State Agencies on page 9.)
Further information and guidance on classification of waste generators can be found in Hazardous Waste from Small Quantity Generators (1990). Also called the SQG book, this source gives guidance for businesses and governments on the proper management of hazardous waste from small-quantity generators. Hazardous Waste from Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators in the Municipal Solid Waste Stream: A Literature Review (1993) covers several state and local studies that have characterized CESQG waste generation and management practices.
There are three groups or units responsible for managing hazardous waste. They include the laboratory professional (i.e., the conservator), the waste manager, and the waste handling operator. The conservator is involved in planning the use of hazardous materials. (S)he is the decision maker in considering the use of alternative materials that may be less hazardous or in establishing a program of minimization of the amount of hazardous materials kept in stock in the studio.
In a larger conservation laboratory or studio, the conservator may, especially if using large volumes of a hazardous material, recycle or treat hazardous waste. No matter what programs are instituted by the conservator in private practice, as long as hazardous waste is being generated, she or he must handle that hazardous waste. This practice includes proper labeling of the waste and once accumulated, the proper storage of this waste. In larger facilities, there may be a designated manager, but in the private studio, the conservator will often carry out the duties of the waste manager. The conservator in private practice may opt to subcontract this management to a trained individual who can provide oversight, training, auditing, interpretation of regulations, and collect the waste. Waste collection includes the storage, labeling, packaging, manifesting, and removing hazardous waste. The waste handling operator is the person who is familiar with and responsible for making sure that Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations are followed. Waste handling operators must have a permit from RCRA that allows them to transport, treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. This is a responsibility that must be contracted to a highly trained professional organization or company.
One of the best ways to ensure compliance with hazardous waste regulations is to set up a visit by an inspector from a state or local hazardous waste agency. These visits can help identify and correct problems. During the visit, one can ask the inspector questions and receive advice on effective ways to manage hazardous waste. The best way to prepare for a visit from an inspector is to conduct your own self inspection. Self inspection involves a review of ones own laboratory practices and protocols for waste management. The following steps serve as a guide for this process.
Inventory chemicals present in the laboratory or studio. The inventory should include an estimate of quantities of materials and a confirmation that an MSDS for each material is on hand. In planning upcoming projects, it is important to consider the type and amount of waste they might produce. In addition, think of any methods or techniques that you can employ to limit or reduce your inventory of hazardous materials as well as your future waste accumulation.
It is always safest and most cost effective to keep wastes in separate containers. Store waste containers properly by segregating them according to the categories defined by federal regulations. Follow the same compatibility rules in storing waste materials as one would in storing fresh chemicals. Also, see the box, Some Information on Chemical Compatibilities with Regard to Waste for specific information on containerization and disposal of particular classes of chemicals.
Ask the contracted waste management company or waste hauler about the type of container they prefer and how it should be labeled. In most cases, reusing the glass bottles in which the chemical was purchased is a convenient solution. This approach postpones the problem of disposing of empty bottles. The original labels should be obliterated or removed and the bottles clearly and properly labeled as waste. Glass or plastic is preferable to metal because small amounts of water in the waste will not cause rusting. An advantage to glass or plastic is that it is transparent and you can see what is inside. Teflon or polyethylene containers are good and are less apt to break than glass. Waste bottles should be kept closed. Ether should be kept in a metal container only. Most importantly, make sure that your waste is compatible with the composition of the container.
Also ask your waste hauler how they would like your containers packaged. For example, waste containers may be kept in cardboard boxes. For maximum safety these boxes can be lined with polyethylene and filled in with vermiculite around the bottles. This fill is an absorbent material which becomes a contained slush if waste leaks or is spilled. Even though waste has been containerized, incompatible materials must not be put in the same box. As a final precaution, place a small tray under each bottle.
The following is short list of some specific incompatibilities:
Removal of waste from the site depends upon what arrangements have been made for transport and final disposal. There are two options: the conservation staff can prepare the waste for direct transport to a disposal site, or an intermediate receiver can pack or prepare the waste in some way for transport and/or final disposal. These arrangements depend upon the type and size of the conservation laboratory in question.
Disposal of waste may mean filling out a hazardous waste manifest which indicates what kind of waste is in the container, who produced the waste, the name of the transporter and manner of disposal. By signing these forms the generator, the transporter and the disposal site all share some responsibility for the waste, however the government always views the waste as belonging to the generator (cradle). This manifest tracks the chain of custody for hazardous waste shipments. Although CESDQs are not required to fill out a manifest, state regulations and local regulations may be more stringent.
Information about where to find a waste hauler, an intermediate receiver and a final disposal site will be specific to each county and state. Contact local waste haulers, waste management companies, or other small waste generators, health services department, or local fire stations to ask how disposal is handled in your community. Organizations which function under the auspices of state or federal agencies should be able to give some guidance. Smaller or non-affiliated conservation laboratories can contact waste management companies and haulers. Larger companies and haulers may find it too expensive or cumbersome to handle the typically small quantities that conservation laboratories generate, but sometimes arrangements can be made if the containers are properly labeled and if it is understood how the to fill out the manifest forms which record the disposal. If it is not possible to locate a company which can handle small quantities, contact nearby organizations that generate small quantities of varied waste to find out how they manage their waste. Note that generator may not piggyback waste into the waste stream of a local institution unless the work is performed on site at that institution. Any waste company or hauler must be registered with the state and the EPA.
The cost of managing hazardous waste is an important issue for the conservator. While these costs cannot be avoided, they can be reduced. For example, in finding a company to remove accumulated hazardous waste, it is best to comparison shop. With multiple quotes for the cost of removal, the conservator can search for the most economical vendor. However, be wary of quotes that are significantly lower than the majority of vendors quotes. This could signal a vendor who is unscrupulous in their waste management practices. Since the responsibility of the generator goes with the waste to the grave, the conservator may find that they will share the costs of a site cleanup if the vendor illegally dumps any of the conservators waste. The more waste generated by the conservator and/or the more acute the hazard, the more it will cost for its removal.
There are may resources available to the conservator for hazardous waste management. These include the state EPA office, local fire department, the AIC Health and Safety Committee, the local health department, the local sewage disposal system or waste management company, the Internet, local library, safety catalogs or even the clients safety officer. In addition, the following list of web and paper based resources and references can provide further information to augment this article.
The authors and the Health and Safety Committee appreciate and thank Mary K. Lanigan, Smithsonian Institution Office of Safety and Environmental Management, for her technical review of this manuscript. Some of the text for this article was reprinted with permission from two earlier articles published in the WAAC Newsletter. These articles are:
White, M. 1998. Health and safety annex CESQGs. WAAC Newsletter 20(3).
Black, C., and C. Stavroudis. 1984. Hazardous waste disposal. WAAC Newsletter 6(2).
SOME INFORMATION ON CHEMICAL COMPATIBILITIES WITH REGARD TO WASTEThe materials used by most conservators can be broadly grouped into chemical classes. These classifications are solvents (including paints and varnishes), detergents, acids and alkalies, bleaches, and ethyl ether. As a general rule these classes should not be mixed together in a waste container. The possibility of chemical reaction between incompatible materials is a genuine fire and safety hazard. Solvents:
Detergents:
Acids and Alkalies:
Bleaches:
Ether:
PCBs:
Dry Waste:
|
Some Examples of Procedures
|
References and Resources40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 260267. Hazardous Waste Management Regulations. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. ACS. 1990. Waste management manual for laboratory personnel: Department of government relations and science policy. ACS, Washington D.C. ACS. 1993. Less is betterlaboratory chemical management for waste reduction: Department of government relations and science policy. ACS, Washington, D.C. Armour, M.A. 1991 Hazardous laboratory chemicals: Disposal guide. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. Babin, A., and M. McCann. 1992. Waste management and disposal for artists and schools, Center for Safety in the Arts, New York. Committee on Hazardous Substances in the Laboratory/Assembly of Mathematical and Physical Sciences/National Research Council. 1981. Prudent practices for handling hazardous chemicals in laboratories. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Cuthbertson, B. 1990. The federal hazardous waste regulations for household hazardous waste collection programs. Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Household Hazardous Waste Management, San Francisco. EPA. 1993. Hazardous waste from conditionally exempt small quantity generators in the municipal solid waste stream: a literature review. EPA, Washington D.C. EPA. 1994. Generation and Management of CESQG Waste. EPA, Washington, D.C. Furr, A. K. 2000. CRC handbook of laboratory safety. 5th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Phifer, R. W., and W. R. McTique, Jr. 1988. Handbook of hazardous waste management for small quantity generators. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers. Safety in Academic Chemistry Laboratories. 1995. Washington, DC: The American Chemical Society. Schwartz, S. I., and W. B. Pratt. 1990. Hazardous waste from small-quantity generators. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Websites
|
State Agencies |
||
|
Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa |
Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota |
Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming |
![]() |
||